EVE Search - CAIN enters the Slaughterhouse

All Channels

Intergalactic Summit

CAIN enters the Slaughterhouse

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.04.16 09:50:00 - [1] Originally by: Jasmine Constantine Originally by: Archbishop And proves just how irrelevant they really are. So irrelevent that a vast coalition of over a thousand pilots is trying and failing to remove us from your HQ System and losing the war comprehensively in space. But then you wouldn't know anything about that would you ... dockmonkey Keep posting, keep galnet stalking. Keep showing how irrelevent we are. You have no life without us. Perhaps you would care to remind us all how far the entire SF fleet moved last Wednesday just to hear this "dockmonkey stalker" give a sermon? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.04.16 12:30:00 - [2] Originally by: Sable Schroedinger Originally by: Rodj Blake Perhaps you would care to remind us all how far the entire SF fleet moved last Wednesday just to hear this "dockmonkey stalker" give a sermon? quite some distance - completely unchallenged by the great powers of the Amarrian paramilitaries in their home systems, to find a tired old man hiding deep in space in a cloaked industrial spewing drivel in a voice shaking in fear that he might be found. All this whilst the mighty fleet of the paramilitaries scurried around in abject fear of being tracked down. Finally fleeing for the docking ports when they were. Yes, we had quite the chuckle as once again the pride of post-humanism wandered around apparently aimlessly while our fleet quietly went about its business without hindrance. Quote: He is a dockmonkey stalker. Sitting in a deep safe spot cloaked and shivering doesn't change that. Surely sitting cloaked in space does change his alleged status as a "dockmonkey". As for stalking, it was your pilots following Monsignor to him like so many rats following the piper, not vice versa. Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.04.16 13:31:00 - [3] Originally by: The Cosmopolite Originally by: Rodj Blake As for stalking, it was your pilots following Monsignor to him like so many rats following the piper, not vice versa. False. Monsignor followed us for a period and never got ahead of us so very much vice versa. Someone has been telling you lies. The Cosmopolite So your fleet was heading towards Archbishop's location without any prompting then? And you use that to justify the description of Archbishop as a stalker? Care to remind us how much you outnumbered him by? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.04.16 13:36:00 - [4] Originally by: The Cosmopolite Originally by: Rodj Blake So your fleet was heading towards Archbishop's location without any prompting then? Correct. Quote: And you use that to justify the description of Archbishop as a stalker? No. Quote: Care to remind us how much you outnumbered him by? Massively. The Cosmopolite I'm glad that we agree that Archbishop's behaviour is more like that of a stalkee rather than a stalker. And really, do you expect someone massively outnumbered to engage you in combat when they are where they are to do something completely different? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.04.16 14:18:00 - [5] Originally by: The Cosmopolite Edited by: The Cosmopolite on 16/04/2007 14:04:23 Originally by: Rodj Blake I'm glad that we agree that Archbishop's behaviour is more like that of a stalkee rather than a stalker. We don't agree on any such thing. I haven't commented on that matter. I merely confirmed that I do not use the status of our fleet at any time as justification of that particular point. Do you believe that Archbishop is a stalker, even though wherever he goes there appears to be an SF fleet behind him (I believe that he was followed out of Empire space recently in a separate incident)? Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
Rodj Blake Amarr PIE Inc.	Posted - 2007.04.16 14:43:00 - [6] Edited by: Rodj Blake on 16/04/2007 14:41:01 Originally by: The Cosmopolite Originally by: Rodj Blake Do you believe that Archbishop is a stalker, even though wherever he goes there appears to be an SF fleet behind him (I believe that he was followed out of Empire space recently in a separate incident)? When not dealing with specific points raised by that turbulent priest, I prefer to keep my personal view of Archbishop's state of mind to myself. Ultimately, when a viable war target is known to be in space we will hunt it to the best extent of our abilities. I am not sure why this should be so fantastic or disturbing a policy. The Cosmopolite That SF would choose to try to kill Archbishop isn't surprising. That SF would try to track down Archbishop and then accuse him of stalking them is. I mean, SF condemning other people for carrying out actions they themselves do is almost unheard of. No wait, now that I think of it... Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.